The field of
legal malpractice has developed as a result of attorneys who provide medical malpractice representation to clients, which fails to meet the applicable standard of care. In other words, these
medical malpractice attorneys conducted the practice of law on behalf of their clients in an unprofessional and negligent manner. Those who have fallen victim to such negligent practices are in need of
legal malpractice lawyers to handle their claims against their previous attorneys.
legal malpractice claims are not so cut and dried when it comes to successfully establishing one's claim. Any client intending to file a
legal malpractice claim against a
medical malpractice attorney must be fully aware of what move be proven in order to be successful. The
legal malpractice lawyers who take on such cases are tasked with proving that the defendant attorney neglected to perform the services they were hired to perform according to the standard of care in the industry. In essence, the defendant attorney must be shown to have failed to provide services in the manner that a regular attorney would have provided such services. In order to have a legally recognizable claim, the client is required to have suffered damage, usually in the form of some monetary loss, as a direct result of his attorney's malpractice. This must be also proven in the case in order to be successful.
legal malpractice can generally be placed into two brackets: breach of fiduciary duty and claims arising out of negligent tactical decisions. An attorney owes a fiduciary duty to his client. When a
medical malpractice attorney fails to abide by the terms of the contract, commonly known as the retainer agreement, between them and the client, they have not only caused a breach of that contract, but also a breach of their fiduciary duty to the client. Most often, this type of claim involves some sort of self-serving conduct on the attorney's part, to the detriment of the client resulting in some sort of damage, the most common of which is financial harm. As
legal malpractice lawyers will inform you, this self-serving behavior of the attorney's usually is to achieve some sort of financial gain for the
medical malpractice attorney. Most of these kinds of cases are relatively easy to establish.
The more difficult claim is the one arising out of an attorney's failure to make appropriate strategic choices during their representation of a client in a
medical malpractice case. This claim involves an attorney litigating a case in a manner in which no other reasonable
medical malpractice attorney would handle such a case. Plaintiffs, and thus their
legal malpractice lawyers, have a much more difficult burden due to the fact that these cases are not clear-cut. Here it must be established that the strategy taken by the defendant attorney was one, which no other attorney would reasonably have taken and that this conduct was the direct cause of monetary, or other, damage to the client. Note that if the plaintiff client cannot prove that they would have prevailed in the underlying case, if not for the attorney's negligent representation, then they will be unsuccessful in establishing a malpractice claim.
There are some very clear-cut cases that fall under this second category of malpractice claims. For example, failing to file a lawsuit within the proscribed statute of limitations is automatically considered
legal malpractice. You will find that most
legal malpractice lawyers will be quick to take on such a case for the wronged client. Failing to follow certain legal prerequisites can also bar a lawsuit, making this another simple case of malpractice. Whatever the claim, hiring attorneys who specialize in this area is the best way to ensure you get the best representation in your malpractice matter.
If you require more information, assistance, and guidance on medical malpractice, malpractice lawyers, Medical Malpractice Insurance,
Legal Malpractice issues in Medical Malpractice cases, please do visit our site or contact us - http://www.malpracticelawyer.org/